On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 13:23 -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:42:46 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:

quoted

quoted

Here's a more handy link filtered down to failures (clicking on 
the test counts links here):

https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?branch=net-next-2024-01-24--15-00&executor=vmksft-net-mp&pass=0

I have been attributing the udpg[rs]o and timestamp tests to you,
but I haven't actually checked.. are they not yours? :)  

I just looked at the result file and assumed 0 meant fine. Oops.

Sorry about the confusion there, make run_tests apparently always
returns 0 and the result file holds the exit code :( It could be
improved by I figured, as long as the JSON output is correct, investing
the time in the web UI is probably a better choice than massaging 
the output files.

Absolutely. My bad for jumping to conclusions.

Some tests are failing because they need an xdp program build under the
ebpf directory.

Since such program is used even by ebpf tests, I'll send a patch
duplicating it under net, and using the existing rule for nat6to4 to
build it.

Cheers,

Paolo