Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2023-12-18

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: add netmem_t to skb_frag_t

flat view

From: Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
Date: 2023-12-18 12:39:53
Also in: kvm, lkml, virtualization

On 2023/12/17 16:09, Mina Almasry wrote:
Use netmem_t instead of page directly in skb_frag_t. Currently netmem_t
is always a struct page underneath, but the abstraction allows efforts
to add support for skb frags not backed by pages.

There is unfortunately 1 instance where the skb_frag_t is assumed to be
a bio_vec in kcm. For this case, add a debug assert that the skb frag is
indeed backed by a page, and do a cast.

Add skb[_frag]_fill_netmem_*() and skb_add_rx_frag_netmem() helpers so
that the API can be used to create netmem skbs.

Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <redacted>
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 
-typedef struct bio_vec skb_frag_t;
+typedef struct skb_frag {
+	struct netmem *bv_page;
bv_page -> bv_netmem?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	unsigned int bv_len;
+	unsigned int bv_offset;
+} skb_frag_t;
 
 /**
  * skb_frag_size() - Returns the size of a skb fragment
@@ -2431,22 +2436,37 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_pagelen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return skb_headlen(skb) + __skb_pagelen(skb);
 }
 
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 /**
@@ -2462,10 +2482,10 @@ static inline void skb_len_add(struct sk_buff *skb, int delta)
 }
 
 /**
- * __skb_fill_page_desc - initialise a paged fragment in an skb
+ * __skb_fill_netmem_desc - initialise a paged fragment in an skb
  * @skb: buffer containing fragment to be initialised
  * @i: paged fragment index to initialise
- * @page: the page to use for this fragment
+ * @netmem: the netmem to use for this fragment
  * @off: the offset to the data with @page
  * @size: the length of the data
  *
@@ -2474,10 +2494,13 @@ static inline void skb_len_add(struct sk_buff *skb, int delta)
  *
  * Does not take any additional reference on the fragment.
  */
-static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
-					struct page *page, int off, int size)
+static inline void __skb_fill_netmem_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
+					  struct netmem *netmem, int off,
+					  int size)
 {
-	__skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(skb_shinfo(skb), i, page, off, size);
+	struct page *page = netmem_to_page(netmem);
+
+	__skb_fill_netmem_desc_noacc(skb_shinfo(skb), i, netmem, off, size);
 
 	/* Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is
 	 * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely
@@ -2485,7 +2508,21 @@ static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
 	 */
 	page = compound_head(page);
 	if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
-		skb->pfmemalloc	= true;
+		skb->pfmemalloc = true;
Is it possible to introduce netmem_is_pfmemalloc() and netmem_compound_head()
for netmem, and have some built-time testing to ensure the implementation
is the same between page_is_pfmemalloc()/compound_head() and
netmem_is_pfmemalloc()/netmem_compound_head()? So that we can avoid the
netmem_to_page() as much as possible, especially in the driver.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+}
+
+static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
+					struct page *page, int off, int size)
+{
+	__skb_fill_netmem_desc(skb, i, page_to_netmem(page), off, size);
+}
+
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  */
 static inline struct page *skb_frag_page(const skb_frag_t *frag)
 {
-	return frag->bv_page;
+	return netmem_to_page(frag->bv_page);
It seems we are not able to have a safe type protection for the above
function, as the driver may be able to pass a devmem frag as a param here,
and pass the returned page into the mm subsystem, and compiler is not able
to catch it when compiling.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 83af8aaeb893..053d220aa2f2 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -845,16 +845,24 @@ struct sk_buff *__napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_alloc_skb);
 
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
index 65d1f6755f98..5c46db045f4c 100644
--- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
+++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
@@ -636,9 +636,15 @@ static int kcm_write_msgs(struct kcm_sock *kcm)
 		for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++)
 			msize += skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].bv_len;
 
+		/* The cast to struct bio_vec* here assumes the frags are
+		 * struct page based.
+		 */
+		DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(
+			!skb_frag_page(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0]));
It seems skb_frag_page() always return non-NULL in this patch, the above
checking seems unnecessary?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help