Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: microchip_t1s: additional phy support and collision detect handling
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2023-12-11 14:09:04
Also in:
lkml
## with collision detection enabled iperf3 normal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.54 MBytes 4.65 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 5.40 MBytes 4.53 Mbits/sec receiver iperf3 reverse - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 929 KBytes 761 Kbits/sec 293 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 830 KBytes 680 Kbits/sec receiver ## with collision detection disabled iperf3 normal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 6.39 MBytes 5.36 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 6.19 MBytes 5.17 Mbits/sec receiver iperf3 reverse - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.27 sec 1.10 MBytes 897 Kbits/sec 268 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.01 MBytes 843 Kbits/sec receiver # Conclusions The arm system running the lan865x macphy uses a not yet mainlined driver, see https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231023154649.45931-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com/ (local) The lan865x driver crashed out every once in a while on reverse mode, there is definetly something biased in the driver for tx over rx. Then again it's not accepted yet. Disabling collision detection seemes to have an positive effect. Slightly higher speeds and slightly fewer retransmissions.
I would want to first understand why there is such a big difference
with the direction. Is it TCP backing off because of the packet loss?
Or is there some other problem.
Maybe try with UDP streams, say with a bandwidth of 5Mbps. Do you
loose 4Mbps in one direction? Or a much smaller number of packets.
Are there any usable statistics? FCS errors?
Andrew