Re: [PATCH 0/3] ss: pretty-printing BPF socket-local storage

[PATCH 0/3] ss: pretty-printing BPF socket-local storage · Quentin Deslandes <hidden> · 2023-11-28
[PATCH 2/3] ss: add support for BPF socket-local storage · Quentin Deslandes <hidden> · 2023-11-28
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ss: add support for BPF socket-local storage · Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> · 2023-11-28
[PATCH 1/3] ss: prevent "Process" column from being printed unless requested · Quentin Deslandes <hidden> · 2023-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/3] ss: prevent "Process" column from being printed unless requested · David Ahern <hidden> · 2023-11-29
[PATCH 3/3] ss: pretty-print BPF socket-local storage · Quentin Deslandes <hidden> · 2023-11-28
Re: [PATCH 3/3] ss: pretty-print BPF socket-local storage · Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> · 2023-11-28
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ss: pretty-printing BPF socket-local storage · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2023-11-28
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ss: pretty-printing BPF socket-local storage · Quentin Deslandes <hidden> · 2023-12-08
Re: [PATCH 0/3] ss: pretty-printing BPF socket-local storage · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2023-12-08

From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2023-12-08 17:27:04

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 16:01:56 +0100
Quentin Deslandes [off-list ref] wrote:

I've submitted a v2 to fix Martin's comments and also improve the printing
behavior. The updated revision reduces the number of lines added by 50%.

Not sure about what best format for this is.

Regarding the JSON output, is it specifically for socket-local storage, or
more generally, for the whole tool? I agree with you anyway, but I would argue
that it doesn't fit this series, although I can work on this as a next step.

It is more for the whole tool in future.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help