Re: [PATCH v3] net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2023-12-06 13:35:46
Also in:
linux-hams
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:13 PM Hyunwoo Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- net/rose/af_rose.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c index 0cc5a4e19900..7ff76bf3f56e 100644 --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c@@ -1316,8 +1316,10 @@ static int rose_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) struct sk_buff *skb; long amount = 0L; /* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only user tasks fiddle here */
Can you remove this stale and confused comment ? Thanks.