On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:13:44 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:57:21PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 04:44:24 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:00:22PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 03:59:03 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:53:00PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:

quoted

Hi Michael,

Do you think it's appropriate to push the first two patches of this patch set to
linux 6.6?

Thanks.

I generally treat patchsets as a whole unless someone asks me to do
otherwise. Why do you want this?

As we discussed, the patch set supporting AF_XDP will be push to net-next.
But the two patchs belong to the vhost.

So, if you think that is appropriate, I will post a new patchset(include the two
patchs without virtio-net + AF_XDP) to vhost. I wish that can be merged to 6.6.

Oh wait 6.6? Too late really, merge window has been closed for weeks.

I mean as a fix. So I ask you do you think it is appropriate?

Sure if there's a bugfix please post is separately - what issues do
these two patches fix? this is the part I'm missing. Especially patch 2
which just adds a new API.

No bugfix. That is the requirement of the supporting AF_XDP.

So please ignore my question. Sorry ^_^.

Thanks.

quoted

quoted

quoted

Then when the 6.7 net-next merge window is open, I can push this patch set to 6.7.
The v1 version use the virtqueue_dma_map_single_attrs to replace
virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs. But I think we should use virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs.

Thanks.

Get a complete working patchset that causes no regressions posted first please
then we will discuss merge strategy.
I would maybe just put everything in one file for now, easier to merge,
refactor later when it's all upstream. But up to you.

OK. I will get a working patchset firstly.

Thanks.

quoted

quoted

quoted

--
MST