Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-10-31 04:52:06
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-next, lkml
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-10-31 04:52:06
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-next, lkml
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:02:43PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:23:53 +0800 Herbert Xu wrote:quoted
If we simply apply this patch to the netdev tree then everything should work at the next merge window. But perhaps you could change the patch description to say something like remove the obsolete crypto_hash_alignmask. It's not important though.I'm happy to massage the commit message and apply the fix to net. But is it actually 100% correct to do that? IOW is calling crypto_ahash_alignmask() already not necessary in net-next or does it only become unnecessary after some prep work in crypto-next? We can tell Linus to squash this fix into the merge of either crypto-next or net-next, I'm pretty sure he'd be okay with that..
It's safe to fold the patch into net-next. It actually looks like a bug to be using the alignmask in the way that net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c is using it. You don't want to be erroring out just because the algorithm declared an alignmask. - Eric