[PATCH RT 03/12] Revert "softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job"
From: Joseph Salisbury <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-18 19:49:09
Also in:
linux-rt-users, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2023-10-18 · [PATCH RT 03/12] Revert "softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job" · Joseph Salisbury <hidden>
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
v5.15.133-rt70-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
-----------
This reverts the following commits:
4cd13c21b207 ("softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job")
3c53776e29f8 ("Mark HI and TASKLET softirq synchronous")
1342d8080f61 ("softirq: Don't skip softirq execution when softirq thread is parking")
in a single change to avoid known bad intermediate states introduced by a
patch series reverting them individually.
Due to the mentioned commit, when the ksoftirqd threads take charge of
softirq processing, the system can experience high latencies.
In the past a few workarounds have been implemented for specific
side-effects of the initial ksoftirqd enforcement commit:
commit 1ff688209e2e ("watchdog: core: make sure the watchdog_worker is not deferred")
commit 8d5755b3f77b ("watchdog: softdog: fire watchdog even if softirqs do not get to run")
commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in sk_busy_loop()")
commit 3c53776e29f8 ("Mark HI and TASKLET softirq synchronous")
But the latency problem still exists in real-life workloads, see the link
below.
The reverted commit intended to solve a live-lock scenario that can now be
addressed with the NAPI threaded mode, introduced with commit 29863d41bb6e
("net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support"), which is nowadays
in a pretty stable status.
While a complete solution to put softirq processing under nice resource
control would be preferable, that has proven to be a very hard task. In
the short term, remove the main pain point, and also simplify a bit the
current softirq implementation.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Tested-by: Jason Xing <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/305d7742212cbe98621b16be782b0562f1012cb6.camel@redhat.com (local)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/57e66b364f1b6f09c9bc0316742c3b14f4ce83bd.1683526542.git.pabeni@redhat.com (local)
(cherry picked from commit d15121be7485655129101f3960ae6add40204463)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury <redacted>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 22 ++--------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 41f470929e99..398951403331 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c@@ -80,21 +80,6 @@ static void wakeup_softirqd(void) wake_up_process(tsk); } -/* - * If ksoftirqd is scheduled, we do not want to process pending softirqs - * right now. Let ksoftirqd handle this at its own rate, to get fairness, - * unless we're doing some of the synchronous softirqs. - */ -#define SOFTIRQ_NOW_MASK ((1 << HI_SOFTIRQ) | (1 << TASKLET_SOFTIRQ)) -static bool ksoftirqd_running(unsigned long pending) -{ - struct task_struct *tsk = __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd); - - if (pending & SOFTIRQ_NOW_MASK) - return false; - return tsk && task_is_running(tsk) && !__kthread_should_park(tsk); -} - #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hardirqs_enabled); DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
@@ -236,7 +221,7 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) goto out; pending = local_softirq_pending(); - if (!pending || ksoftirqd_running(pending)) + if (!pending) goto out; /*
@@ -419,9 +404,6 @@ static inline bool should_wake_ksoftirqd(void) static inline void invoke_softirq(void) { - if (ksoftirqd_running(local_softirq_pending())) - return; - if (!force_irqthreads() || !__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd)) { #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK /*
@@ -455,7 +437,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void do_softirq(void) pending = local_softirq_pending(); - if (pending && !ksoftirqd_running(pending)) + if (pending) do_softirq_own_stack(); local_irq_restore(flags);
--
2.34.1