Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool
From: takeru hayasaka <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-12 01:08:16
Also in:
intel-wired-lan, lkml
I think we should expose TEID as a field. It's easier to understand the API if fields are all listed, and not implied by the flow hash.
Jakub san Thank you for your feedback! I would like to make changes and send them as a patch for the next version. 2023年10月12日(木) 1:41 Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:25:55 +0900 takeru hayasaka wrote:quoted
quoted
Regarding the patch - you are only adding flow types, not a new field (which are defined as RXH_*). If we want to hash on an extra field, I think we need to specify that field as well?I've been really struggling with this... When I read the Intel ICE documentation, it suggests that in RSS, TEID can be an additional input. However, I couldn't think of a reason not to include TEID when enabling RSS for GTP cases. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/617015/intel-ethernet-controller-e810-dynamic-device-personalization-ddp-technology-guide.html (cf. Table 8. Patterns and Input Sets for iavf RSS) However, for Flow Director, it's clear that you'd want to include the TEID field. But since I found that someone from Intel has already configured it to use TEID with Flow Director, I thought maybe we don't need to add the TEID parameter for now. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/cover/20210126065206.137422-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com/ If we want to include something other than TEID (e.g., QFI) in Flow Director, I think it would be better to prepare a new field.I think we should expose TEID as a field. It's easier to understand the API if fields are all listed, and not implied by the flow hash.