On Sat, Sep 30 2023 at 14:15, Richard Cochran wrote:

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:06:46AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:

quoted

But I still think we should avoid exporting the raw cycle values
unless there is some extremely strong argument for it

Looks like the argument was based on a misunderstanding of what
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW actually is.  So, please, let's not expose the raw
cycle counter value.

Correct. Exposing the raw counter value is broken if the counter wraps
around on a regular base.

Thanks,

        tglx