Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc offload in channel mode
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-10-06 12:29:58
Also in:
lkml
On 05/10/2023 12:01, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:27:39AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c index f91137d8e73b..991221d8f148 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c@@ -16,10 +16,19 @@ #include "cpsw_ale.h" #define AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL 0x004 +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_TX_PRI_MAP 0x018 +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_RX_PRI_MAP 0x020 +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_FIFO_STATUS 0x050 +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_CIR(pri) (0x140 + 4 * (pri)) +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_EIR(pri) (0x160 + 4 * (pri)) + #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_CTL 0x004 +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP 0x018 +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_RX_PRI_MAP 0x020 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_FIFO_STATUS 0x050 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_EST_CTL 0x060 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(pri) (0x140 + 4 * (pri)) +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_EIR(pri) (0x160 + 4 * (pri)) /* AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL register fields */ #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_EST_EN BIT(18)@@ -50,12 +59,18 @@ #define AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MSK GENMASK(7, 0) #define AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MAX AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MSK +#define TO_MBPS(x) ((x) * 8 / 1000000) + enum timer_act { TACT_PROG, /* need program timer */ TACT_NEED_STOP, /* need stop first */ TACT_SKIP_PROG, /* just buffer can be updated */ }; +/* number of priority queues per port FIFO */ +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_FIFO_PRIO_NUM 8 +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT 0x76543210quoted
+static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev) +{ + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev); + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio; + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common; + + p_mqprio->shaper_en = false; + p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0; + + am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port); + netdev_reset_tc(ndev); + netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);If this never gets changed from the value set by am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_open(), then there is no reason to call netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() here.quoted
+ + /* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */ + writel(0, port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);To 0 or to AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT (which is now unused)? Also, do I understand correctly that immediately after boot, TX_PRI_MAP will have a different value than after the deletion of the mqprio root qdisc (if AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT represents the hardware default value)? The behavior needs to be identical in the 2 cases, since both represent "no mqprio offload".
Good catch. I'll get rid of AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT and set this to 0 at init time.
quoted
+} + +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data) +{ + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev); + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio; + struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data; + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common; + struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt; + int tc, offset, count, ret, prio; + u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc; + u32 tx_prio_map = 0; + int i; + + memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio)); + + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev); + if (ret < 0) { + pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev); + return ret; + } + + if (!num_tc) { + am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev); + goto exit_put; + } + + ret = am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(port, mqprio); + if (ret) + goto exit_put;At "exit_put" we have "return 0" and this discards the value of "ret".
Will fix.
quoted
+ + netdev_set_num_tc(ndev, num_tc); + + /* Multiple Linux priorities can map to a Traffic Class + * A Traffic Class can have multiple contiguous Queues, + * Queues get mapped to Channels (thread_id), + * if not VLAN tagged, thread_id is used as packet_priority + * if VLAN tagged. VLAN priority is used as packet_priorit + * packet_priority gets mapped to header_priority in p0_rx_pri_map, + * header_priority gets mapped to switch_priority in pn_tx_pri_map. + * As p0_rx_pri_map is left at defaults (0x76543210), we can + * assume that Queue_n gets mapped to header_priority_n. We can then + * set the switch priority in pn_tx_pri_map. + */ + + for (tc = 0; tc < num_tc; tc++) { + prio = tc; + + /* For simplicity we assign the same priority (TCn) to + * all queues of a Traffic Class. + */ + for (i = qopt->offset[tc]; i < qopt->offset[tc] + qopt->count[tc]; i++) + tx_prio_map |= prio << (4 * i); + + count = qopt->count[tc]; + offset = qopt->offset[tc]; + netdev_set_tc_queue(ndev, tc, count, offset); + }I think this is okay.quoted
+ + writel(tx_prio_map, + port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);Nit: This can be written on a single line.
OK.
quoted
+ + am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(port); + +exit_put: + pm_runtime_put(common->dev); + return 0; +} + int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data) {
-- cheers, -roger