Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 7 authors, 2023-10-17

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-10-14 16:15:07
Also in: rust-for-linux

On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 14:54:30 +0000
Benno Lossin [off-list ref] wrote:
On 14.10.23 12:32, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:07:03 +0000
Benno Lossin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 14.10.23 09:22, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 21:31:16 +0000
Benno Lossin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+    /// the exclusive access for the duration of the lifetime `'a`.
In some other thread you mentioned that no lock is held for
`resume`/`suspend`, how does this interact with it?
The same quesiton, 4th time?
Yes, it is not clear to me from the code/safety comment alone why
this is safe. Please improve the comment such that that is the case.
quoted
PHYLIB is implemented in a way that PHY drivers exlusively access to
phy_device during the callbacks.
As I suggested in a previous thread, it would be extremely helpful
if you add a comment on the `phy` abstractions module that explains
how `PHYLIB` is implemented. Explain that it takes care of locking
and other safety related things.
 From my understanding, the callers of suspend() try to call suspend()
for a device only once. They lock a device and get the current state
and update the sate, then unlock the device. If the state is a
paticular value, then call suspend(). suspend() and resume() are also
called where only one thread can access a device.
Maybe explain this in the docs? In the future, when I will come
into contact with this again, I will probably have forgotten this
conversation, but the docs are permanent and can be re-read.
You meant adding this to the code?  like dding this to Device's #
Safety comment?

quoted
Anyway,

phy_id()
state()
get_link()
is_autoneg_enabled()
is_autoneg_completed()

doesn't modify Self.
yes, these should all be `&self`.
quoted
The rest modifies then need to be &mut self? Note that function like read_*
updates the C data structure.
What exactly does it update? In Rust there is interior mutability
which is used to implement mutexes. Interior mutability allows
you to modify values despite only having a `&T` (for more info
see [1]). Our `Opaque<T>` type uses this pattern as well (since
you get a `*mut T` from `&Opaque<T>`) and it is the job of the
abstraction writer to figure out what mutability to use.

[1]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/interior-mutability.html

I have no idea what exactly `read_*` modifies on the C side.
Mapping C functions to `&self`, `&mut self` and other receiver types
is not obvious in all cases. I would focus more on the following aspect
of `&mut self` and `&self`:

Since `&mut self` is unique, only one thread per instance of `Self`
can call that function. So use this when the C side would use a lock.
(or requires that only one thread calls that code)
I guess that the rest are &mut self but let me continue to make sure.

I think that you already know that Device instance only was created in
the callbacks. Before the callbacks are called, PHYLIB holds
phydev->lock except for resume()/suspend(). As explained in the
previous mail, only one thread calls resume()/suspend().

btw, methods in Device calling a C side function like mdiobus_read,
mdiobus_write, etc which never touch phydev->lock. Note that the c
side functions in resume()/suspned() methods don't touch phydev->lock
too.

There are two types how the methods in Device changes the C side data.

1. read/write/read_paged

They call the C side functions, mdiobus_read, mdiobus_write,
phy_read_paged, respectively.

phy_device has a pointer to mii_bus object. It has stats for
read/write. So everytime they are called, stats is updated.

2. the rest

The C side functions in the rest of methods in Device updates some
members in phy_device like set_speed() method does.

Since multiple `&self` references are allowed to coexist, you should
use this for functions which perform their own serialization/do not
require serialization.
just to be sure, the C side guarantees that only one reference exists.

If you cannot decide what certain function receivers should be, then
we can help you, but I would need more info on what the C side is doing.
If you need more info on the C side, please let me know.

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+/// Defines certain other features this PHY supports (like interrupts).
Maybe add a link where these flags can be used.
I already put the link to here in trait Driver.
I am asking about a link here, as it is a bit confusing when
you just stumble over this flag module here. It doesn't hurt
to link more.
I can't find the code does the similar. What exactly do you expect?
Like this?

/// Defines certain other features this PHY supports (like interrupts) for [`Driver`]'s `FLAGS`.
IIRC you can directly link to the field:

     [`Driver::FLAGS`]

Also maybe split the sentence. So one idea would be:

     /// Defines certain other features this PHY supports (like interrupts).
     ///
     /// These flag values are used in [`Driver::FLAGS`].
Thanks, will do.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help