Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 5 authors, 2023-10-31

Re: [PATCH net 5/5] net/smc: put sk reference if close work was canceled

From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2023-10-12 19:04:25
Also in: linux-rdma, linux-s390


On 11.10.23 09:33, D. Wythe wrote:
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

Note that we always hold a reference to sock when attempting
to submit close_work. 
yes
Therefore, if we have successfully
canceled close_work from pending, we MUST release that reference
to avoid potential leaks.
Isn't the corresponding reference already released inside the 
smc_close_passive_work()?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: 42bfba9eaa33 ("net/smc: immediate termination for SMCD link groups")
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
  net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index 449ef45..10219f5 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ static void smc_close_cancel_work(struct smc_sock *smc)
  	struct sock *sk = &smc->sk;
  
  	release_sock(sk);
-	cancel_work_sync(&smc->conn.close_work);
+	if (cancel_work_sync(&smc->conn.close_work))
+		sock_put(sk);
  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&smc->conn.tx_work);
  	lock_sock(sk);
  }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help