Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-10-07 03:26:14
Also in:
rust-for-linux
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-10-07 03:26:14
Also in:
rust-for-linux
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 19:37:15 -0400 Trevor Gross [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:47 AM Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
So I think that merging the patchset through a single tree is easier; netdev or rust. Miguel, how do you prefer to merge the patchset?What are the merge conflicts looking like? What has happened in the past? [...]Miguel has said before that if subsystems are comfortable bringing rust through their trees then they are welcome to do so, which helps get a better idea of how everything works together. If you prefer not to, it can come through rust-next with no problem.
It makes sense because these bindings are maintained by subsystems. I'll send patches with 'net-next' tag in the next round.