Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2023-10-02

Re: configfs: Create config_item from netconsole

From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: 2023-10-02 14:23:56

Hello Joel,

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:51:43AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:44:58AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
quoted
Should I create a configfs_register_item() to solve this problem?
It's an express philosophy of configfs that all lifetimes are controlled
by userspace, which is why we don't have such a facility.  If hch wants
to change this, I defer to his judgement.  But I don't think it is
necessary.
I am happy the suggestion you gave, so, no need to change this
philosophy.
In this fashion, each console created on the command line will get a
name of `cmdline0`, `cmdline1`, etc.  They will not be part of the
configfs tree.  If the user comes along later and says `mkdir
/sys/kernel/config/netconsole/cmdline1`, the existing `cmdline1` console
will be attached to the configfs tree.  The user is then free to disable
and reconfigure the device.
I am happy with this approach.
There would, of course, be some other corner cases to handle.  Do we
allow dynamic names that look like command-line names if no command-line
parameter exists? 
I'd say so, I think `cmdline` targets shouldn't be special if there are
not netconsole targets defined at boot time.

Does `rmdir /sys/kernel/config/netconsole/cmdline0`
actually delete the command-line console entry, or does it return
-EBUSY?  And so on.
I've looked at the code and tested, it `cmdline0`could be removed as any
other target entry. On top of that, the user can create a new `cmdline0`
entry, and, it will be set with the default values for the attributes.

I am planning to send a patch based on what you suggested, and we can
continue the discuss there.

Thanks for the _very_ detailed feedback!
Breno
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help