On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 22:38 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:19:54PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:

quoted

DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different
opinion?

For this series should be fine, I'm not sure about the next series.
Merging this with the virtio tree, then it forces us to do it for
followup as well right?

In theory followup is more on the core, so better with net-next, but
it's also true that for now only virtio transports support it, so it
might be okay to continue with virtio.

@Michael WDYT?

Thanks,
Stefano

I didn't get DaveM's mail - was this off-list?

Yes, that was off-list co-ordination.

I think net-next is easier because the follow up belongs in net-next.
But if not I can take it, sure. Let me know.

Since there is agreement on that route, we will take it (likely
tomorrow).

Cheers,

Paolo