Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
From: Arseniy Krasnov <hidden>
Date: 2023-09-15 19:36:30
Also in:
lkml
Small remark on 'Subject' - this is not MSG_PEEK test, it is test for sk_buff merging. Considering that: Reviewed-by: Arseniy Krasnov <redacted> Thanks, Arseniy On 15.09.2023 15:14, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The test was a bit complicated to read. Added variables to keep track of the bytes read and to be read in each step. Also some comments. The test is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c index b18acbaf92e2..5743dcae2350 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c@@ -1002,6 +1002,7 @@ static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client(const struct test_opts *opts) static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts) { + size_t read = 0, to_read; unsigned char buf[64]; int fd;@@ -1014,14 +1015,21 @@ static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts) control_expectln("SEND0"); /* Read skbuff partially. */ - recv_buf(fd, buf, 2, 0, 2); + to_read = 2; + recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, 0, to_read); + read += to_read; control_writeln("REPLY0"); control_expectln("SEND1"); - recv_buf(fd, buf + 2, 8, 0, 8); + /* Read the rest of both buffers */ + to_read = strlen(HELLO_STR WORLD_STR) - read; + recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, 0, to_read); + read += to_read; - recv_buf(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 8 - 2, MSG_DONTWAIT, -EAGAIN); + /* No more bytes should be there */ + to_read = sizeof(buf) - read; + recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, MSG_DONTWAIT, -EAGAIN); if (memcmp(buf, HELLO_STR WORLD_STR, strlen(HELLO_STR WORLD_STR))) { fprintf(stderr, "pattern mismatch\n");