[PATCH net 1/9] netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule removal from chain binding
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2023-09-13 21:58:11
Also in:
netfilter-devel
Subsystem:
netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
Chain binding only requires the rule addition/insertion command within
the same transaction. Removal of rules from chain bindings within the
same transaction makes no sense, userspace does not utilize this
feature. Replace nft_chain_is_bound() check to nft_chain_binding() in
rule deletion commands. Replace command implies a rule deletion, reject
this command too.
Rule flush command can also safely rely on this nft_chain_binding()
check because unbound chains are not allowed since 62e1e94b246e
("netfilter: nf_tables: reject unbound chain set before commit phase").
Fixes: d0e2c7de92c7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_CHAIN_BINDING")
Reported-by: Kevin Rich <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index e429ebba74b3..895c6e4fba97 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx) if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain)) continue; - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) continue; ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx) if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain)) continue; - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) continue; ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -2910,6 +2910,9 @@ static int nf_tables_delchain(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info, return PTR_ERR(chain); } + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + nft_ctx_init(&ctx, net, skb, info->nlh, family, table, chain, nla); if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HOOK]) {
@@ -3971,6 +3974,11 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info, } if (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) { + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) { + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + goto err_destroy_flow_rule; + } + err = nft_delrule(&ctx, old_rule); if (err < 0) goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
@@ -4078,7 +4086,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info, NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN]); return PTR_ERR(chain); } - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
@@ -4112,7 +4120,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info, list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) { if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain)) continue; - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) continue; ctx.chain = chain;
@@ -11054,7 +11062,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table) ctx.family = table->family; ctx.table = table; list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) { - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) continue; ctx.chain = chain;
--
2.30.2