Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2023-08-22

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API

From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Date: 2023-08-15 11:37:04
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk

On 15/08/2023 03:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:31 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
quoted
  create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
  create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c
  create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
Feels like we're lacking tests here. Is there a common subset of
stuff we can expect reasonable devices to support?
Anything you used in development that can be turned into tests?
Well, we were playing with the tool ynl/cli.py and it's stated in
the cover letter. But needs proper hardware to run. I'm not sure
we can easily create emulation device to run tests.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help