Re: [V9 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2023-08-19 10:52:30
Also in:
amd-gfx, linux-acpi, linux-doc, linux-wireless, lkml
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 05:49:14PM -0500, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
On 8/18/2023 4:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:26:11AM +0800, Evan Quan wrote:quoted
drivers/base/Makefile | 1 + drivers/base/wbrf.c | 280 ++++++++++++++++++Why is a wifi-specific thing going into drivers/base/? confused, greg k-hThe original problem statement was at a high level 'there can be interference between different devices operating at high frequencies'. The original patches introduced some ACPI library code that enabled a mitigated for this interference between mac80211 devices and amdgpu devices. Andrew Lunn wanted to see something more generic, so the series has morphed into base code for things to advertise frequencies in use and other things to listen to frequencies in use and react. The idea is supposed to be that if the platform knows that these mitigations are needed then the producers send the frequencies in use, consumers react to them. The AMD implementation of getting this info from the platform plugs into the base code (patch 2). If users don't want this behavior they can turn it off on kernel command line. If the platform doesn't know mitigations are needed but user wants to turn them on anyway they can turn it on kernel command line.
That's all fine, I don't object to that at all. But bus/device-specific stuff should NOT be in drivers/base/ if at all possible (yes, we do have some exceptions with hypervisor.c and memory and cpu stuff) but for a frequency thing like this, why can't it live with the other wifi/frequency code in drivers/net/wireless/? In other words, what's the benefit to having me be the maintainer of this, someone who knows nothing about this subsystem, other than you passing off that work to me? :) thanks, greg k-h