Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] softirq: Drop the warning from do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush().
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2023-08-16 15:23:18
Also in:
lkml
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2023-08-16 15:23:18
Also in:
lkml
On 2023-08-16 16:48:56 [+0200], Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
I'm no expert in sched / softirq area of the kernel, but I'm willing to help out testing different solution that can regain the "overload" protection e.g. avoid packet processing "falls-of-an-edge" (and thus opens the kernel to be DDoS'ed easily). Is this what Sebastian's patchset does?
I was going to respond but didn't know what so far. Can you figure out if you are using backlog or not. If you do, could try my patch. If not could you try to enable napi-thread and see? Either way I will re-read it again. Sebastian