On 2023/08/16 19:16, Simon Horman wrote:

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:34:43PM +0800, GONG, Ruiqi wrote:

quoted

From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <redacted>

As suggested by Kees[1], replace the old-style 0-element array members
of multiple structs in ebtables.h with modern C99 flexible array.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5E8E0F9C-EE3F-4B0D-B827-DC47397E2A4A@kernel.org/ (local)

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
---

v2: designate to net-next; cc more netdev maintainers

It's slightly unclear to me if this should be targeting
net-next or nf-next. But regardless, it doesn't seem
to apply cleanly to the main branch of either tree.

I find out that it's because this patch depends on a previous patch I've
just sent:

[v4] netfilter: ebtables: fix fortify warnings in size_entry_mwt()

Maybe I should make them two into a patch set? Otherwise if I adapt this
patch to net-next, it won't be applied either if the above patch is
applied ...

Please consider resolving that and posting again,
being sure to allow 24h before postings.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html