[PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net: fs_enet: Use cpm_muram_xxx() functions instead of cpm_dpxxx() macros
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-04 13:33:33
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
Subsystem:
freescale soc fs_enet driver, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Pantelis Antoniou, Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
cpm_dpxxx() macros are now always referring to cpm_muram_xxx() fonctions
directly since commit 3dd82a1ea724 ("[POWERPC] CPM: Always use new
binding.")
Use cpm_muram_xxx() functions directly so that the cpm_dpxxx() macros
can be removed in the near future.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c
index ce63fd56df89..d903a9012db0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int do_pd_setup(struct fs_enet_private *fep) goto out_ep; fep->fcc.mem = (void __iomem *)cpm2_immr; - fpi->dpram_offset = cpm_dpalloc(128, 32); + fpi->dpram_offset = cpm_muram_alloc(128, 32); if (IS_ERR_VALUE(fpi->dpram_offset)) { ret = fpi->dpram_offset; goto out_fcccp;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c
index 66d40da5cde0..a64cb6270515 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c@@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ static int allocate_bd(struct net_device *dev) struct fs_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev); const struct fs_platform_info *fpi = fep->fpi; - fep->ring_mem_addr = cpm_dpalloc((fpi->tx_ring + fpi->rx_ring) * - sizeof(cbd_t), 8); + fep->ring_mem_addr = cpm_muram_alloc((fpi->tx_ring + fpi->rx_ring) * + sizeof(cbd_t), 8); if (IS_ERR_VALUE(fep->ring_mem_addr)) return -ENOMEM; fep->ring_base = (void __iomem __force*) - cpm_dpram_addr(fep->ring_mem_addr); + cpm_muram_addr(fep->ring_mem_addr); return 0; }
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void free_bd(struct net_device *dev) struct fs_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev); if (fep->ring_base) - cpm_dpfree(fep->ring_mem_addr); + cpm_muram_free(fep->ring_mem_addr); } static void cleanup_data(struct net_device *dev)
--
2.41.0