Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] net-next: mvpp2: relax return value check for IRQ get
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-08-01 12:44:27
Also in:
lkml
On 8/1/23 15:31, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:04:24PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:quoted
fwnode_irq_get[_byname]() were changed to not return 0 anymore. Drop check for return value 0. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>Sorry, but I don't think you've properly considered the effects of your patch.
Don't be sorry.
quoted
@@ -5833,7 +5833,7 @@ static int mvpp2_multi_queue_vectors_init(struct mvpp2_port *port, v->irq = of_irq_get_byname(port_node, irqname); else v->irq = fwnode_irq_get(port->fwnode, i); - if (v->irq <= 0) { + if (v->irq < 0) {You're making this change based on the assumption that fwnode_irq_get() has changed its return values, but I really don't think you've looked at the code and considered the return value behaviour of the DT function above. Reading it's documentation, it states that of_irq_get_byname() may return 0 on IRQ mapping failure.
You're correct. Thanks for spotting this! Seems like I really overlooked the behaviour of the of_irq_get_byname().
So, by making this change, you are allowing IRQ mapping failure in the DT path to succeed rather than fail.quoted
ret = -EINVAL; goto err; }@@ -6764,7 +6764,7 @@ static int mvpp2_port_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, err = -EPROBE_DEFER; goto err_deinit_qvecs; } - if (port->port_irq <= 0) + if (port->port_irq < 0)Exactly the same problem here, but...quoted
/* the link irq is optional */ port->port_irq = 0;this is less critical... but still wrong. So, given that this patch is basically incorrect... NAK.
-- Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~