Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/9] ethtool: Add forced speed to supported link modes maps
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: 2023-08-25 13:22:08
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
From: Pawel Chmielewski <redacted> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:56:24 +0200
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 12:20:43PM -0700, Greenwalt, Paul wrote:quoted
On 8/20/2023 11:54 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:quoted
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:39:41AM -0700, Paul Greenwalt wrote:quoted
The need to map Ethtool forced speeds to Ethtool supported link modes is common among drivers. To support this move the supported link modes maps implementation from the qede driver. This is an efficient solution introduced in commit 1d4e4ecccb11 ("qede: populate supported link modes maps on module init") for qede driver. ethtool_forced_speed_maps_init() should be called during driver init with an array of struct ethtool_forced_speed_map to populate the mapping. The macro ETHTOOL_FORCED_SPEED_MAP is a helper to initialized the struct ethtool_forced_speed_map.Is there any way to reuse this table: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c#L161 Seems silly to have multiple tables if this one can be made to work. It is also used a lot more than anything you will add, which has just two users so far, so problems with it a likely to be noticed faster. AndrewYes, we'll can look into that.
BTW, drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c also have similar stuff and could probably make use of the generic stuff you're doing as well (qed_main was also done by me). Not speaking of drivers/net/phy/phylink.c We probably should unify all that... Let me think how we could do that. Andrew's idea is good. But most high-speed NICs, which have a standalone management firmware for PHY, don't use phylib/phylink. So in order to be able to unify all that, they should have ->supported bitmap somewhere else. Not sure struct net_device is the best place... If I recall Phylink logics correctly (it's been a while since I last time was working with my embedded project), 1) in the NIC (MAC) driver, you initialize ->supported with *speeds* and stuff like duplex, no link modes; 2) Phylink core sets the corresponding link mode bits; 3) phylib core then clears the bits unsupported by the PHY IIRC The third step in case with those NICs with FW-managed PHYs should be done manually in the MAC driver somewhere. Like "I am qede and I don't support mode XX at 50Gbps, but support the rest, so I clear that one bit". Then the networking core should be able to play this association game itself. That would remove a good amount of boilerplating.
I think it would be better to leave the maps in the code of respective drivers, as they are too much hardware related. Even for a single speed, the sets of supported link modes may vary between the devices. _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Thanks, Olek