Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 2 authors, 2023-08-24
STALE1119d

Revision v1 of 4 in this series.

Revisions (4)
  1. v1 current
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH net 4/6] netfilter: nf_tables: use correct lock to protect gc_list

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2023-08-23 15:27:37
Also in: netfilter-devel
Subsystem: netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

Use nf_tables_gc_list_lock spinlock, not nf_tables_destroy_list_lock to
protect the gc list.

Fixes: 5f68718b34a5 ("netfilter: nf_tables: GC transaction API to avoid race with control plane")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index a255456efae4..eb8b1167dced 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -9456,9 +9456,9 @@ static void nft_trans_gc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct nft_trans_gc *trans, *next;
 	LIST_HEAD(trans_gc_list);
 
-	spin_lock(&nf_tables_destroy_list_lock);
+	spin_lock(&nf_tables_gc_list_lock);
 	list_splice_init(&nf_tables_gc_list, &trans_gc_list);
-	spin_unlock(&nf_tables_destroy_list_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&nf_tables_gc_list_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(trans, next, &trans_gc_list, list) {
 		list_del(&trans->list);
-- 
2.41.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help