On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:04:43PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:

Hi Conor,

conor@kernel.org wrote on Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:50:24 +0100:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On 28/07/2023 12:22, Varshini Rajendran wrote:  

quoted

This patch series adds support for the new SoC family - sam9x7.
 - The device tree, configs and drivers are added
 - Clock driver for sam9x7 is added
 - Support for basic peripherals is added
 - Target board SAM9X75 Curiosity is added
  

Your threading is absolutely broken making it difficult to review and apply.  

I had a chat with Varshini today, they were trying to avoid sending the
patches to a massive CC list, but didn't set any in-reply-to header.
For the next submission whole series could be sent to the binding &
platform maintainers and the individual patches additionally to their
respective lists/maintainers. Does that sound okay to you, or do you
think it should be broken up?

I usually prefer receiving the dt-bindings *and* the driver changes, so
I can give my feedback on the description side, as well as looking at
the implementation and see if that really matches what was discussed
with you :)

Right, that is what I was suggesting. Respective maintainers would get
the drivers *and* bindings for their subsystems - IOW, each patch is
sent to what get_maintainer.pl outputs for it.