Re: [PATCH docs v2] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-19 18:36:27
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-19 18:36:27
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:54:53 -0600 Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
We appear to have a gap in our process docs. We go into detail on how to contribute code to the kernel, and how to be a subsystem maintainer. I can't find any docs directed towards the thousands of small scale maintainers, like folks maintaining a single driver or a single network protocol.I think the split is great. It would be even better if this distinction could be made in MAINTAINERS and then the tools could use that. For example, on treewide changes on Cc subsystem maintainers and skip driver maintainers. The problem right now is Cc'ing everyone quickly hits maillist moderation for too many recipients.
Interesting idea. I wonder how much of this can be accomplished by improvements to get_maintainers and interpreting what we already have. There are inverse annoyances, too, where patches for subsystems get CCed all the way up the hierarchy and including linux-kernel@ for not apparent reason. We have to go sprinkle X: entries in MAINTAINERS currently to prevent it. In any case, I think that's a bit tangential. I sent a v3 already 'cause people kept reporting the same typoes :)