[RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: add support for paged attachment mappings · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: add support for paged attachment mappings · Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> · 2023-07-11
Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: add support for paged attachment mappings · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-11
Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: add support for paged attachment mappings · Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> · 2023-07-11
[RFC PATCH 02/10] dma-buf: add support for NET_RX pages · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 03/10] dma-buf: add support for NET_TX pages · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 04/10] net: add support for skbs with unreadable frags · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 05/10] tcp: implement recvmsg() RX path for devmem TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 06/10] net: add SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED setsockopt to release RX pages · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] net: add SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED setsockopt to release RX pages · Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> · 2023-07-16
Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] net: add SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED setsockopt to release RX pages · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-17
[RFC PATCH 07/10] tcp: implement sendmsg() TX path for for devmem tcp · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 09/10] memory-provider: updates core provider API for devmem TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 08/10] selftests: add ncdevmem, netcat for devmem TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
[RFC PATCH 10/10] memory-provider: add dmabuf devmem provider · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> · 2023-07-17
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-07-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Mina Almasry <hidden> · 2023-07-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> · 2023-07-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> · 2023-07-19
Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> · 2023-07-27
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-07-19

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-18 18:15:16
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arch, linux-kselftest, linux-media, lkml

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:06:29 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

netlink feels like a weird API choice for that, in particular it would
be really wrong to somehow bind the lifecycle of a netlink object to a
process.

Netlink is the right API, life cycle of objects can be easily tied to
a netlink socket.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help