Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 6 authors, 2023-07-29

Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: get_maintainer: steer people away from using file paths

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2023-07-26 16:45:55
Also in: workflows

On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 09:23, Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:43:30 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
quoted
Print a warning when someone tries to use -f and remove
the "auto-guessing" of file paths.
Nack on that bit.
My recollection is it's Linus' preferred mechanism.
Let Linus speak for himself, hopefully he's okay with throwing
in the -f.
It's not the '-f' that would be the problem - that's how the script
used to work long ago, and I still occasionally end up adding the -f
by habit.

So removing the auto-guessing of file paths wouldn't be a problem.

But the annoying warning is wrong.

I use get_maintainers all the time, and I *only* use it for file
paths. If I know the commit, I get the list of people from the commit
itself, so why should I *ever* use that script if I have a patch?

So the whole "use of get_maintainers is only for patches, and we
should warn about file paths" is insane.

No. If I get that patch, I will remove the warning. The *only* reason
for me to ever use that script is for the file path lookup.

             Linus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help