Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3 1/6] ip_tunnel: use a separate struct to store tunnel params in the kernel
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: 2023-07-24 14:23:05
Also in:
intel-wired-lan
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:21:51 +0300
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:15:27AM +0200, Marcin Szycik wrote:quoted
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Unlike IPv6 tunnels which use purely-kernel __ip6_tnl_parm structure to store params inside the kernel, IPv4 tunnel code uses the same ip_tunnel_parm which is being used to talk with the userspace. This makes it difficult to alter or add any fields or use a different format for whatever data. Define struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern, a 1:1 copy of ip_tunnel_parm for now, and use it throughout the code. The two places where the latter is used to interact with the userspace, now do a conversion from one type to another, with manual field-by-field assignments. Must be done at once, since ip_tunnel::parms is being used in most of those places....quoted
+ strscpy(kp.name, p.name, sizeof(kp.name)); + kp.link = p.link; + kp.i_flags = p.i_flags; + kp.o_flags = p.o_flags; + kp.i_key = p.i_key; + kp.o_key = p.o_key; + memcpy(&kp.iph, &p.iph, min(sizeof(kp.iph), sizeof(p.iph))); + + err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_tunnel_ctl(dev, &kp, cmd); + if (err) + return err; + + strscpy(p.name, kp.name, sizeof(p.name)); + p.link = kp.link; + p.i_flags = kp.i_flags; + p.o_flags = kp.o_flags; + p.i_key = kp.i_key; + p.o_key = kp.o_key; + memcpy(&p.iph, &kp.iph, min(sizeof(p.iph), sizeof(kp.iph)));quoted
+ strscpy(kp.name, p.name, sizeof(kp.name)); + kp.link = p.link; + kp.i_flags = p.i_flags; + kp.o_flags = p.o_flags; + kp.i_key = p.i_key; + kp.o_key = p.o_key; + memcpy(&kp.iph, &p.iph, min(sizeof(p.iph), sizeof(kp.iph)));Seems to me these two deserves separate helpers to avoid such a duplication(s).
Sounds reasonable, thanks! Olek