Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix potential deadlock on &net->sctp.addr_wq_lock
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2023-06-29 09:50:15
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2023-06-29 09:50:15
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 12:03 +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
As &net->sctp.addr_wq_lock is also acquired by the timer
sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler() in protocal.c, the same lock acquisition
at sctp_auto_asconf_init() seems should disable irq since it is called
from sctp_accept() under process context.
Possible deadlock scenario:
sctp_accept()
-> sctp_sock_migrate()
-> sctp_auto_asconf_init()
-> spin_lock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock)
<timer interrupt>
-> sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler()
-> spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); (deadlock here)
This flaw was found using an experimental static analysis tool we are
developing for irq-related deadlock.
The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_bh().Patch LGTM. Please note that the above suggests a possible net-next follow- up/cleanup, replacing the spin_lock_bh() in sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler() with a simple/faster spin_lock() - since sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler() runs with BH disabled. Anyhow net-next is closed now, it will have to wait a bit ;) Cheers, Paolo