Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] netfilter: bpf: Support BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG in netfilter link
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2023-06-27 11:13:06
Also in:
bpf, lkml, netfilter-devel
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2023-06-27 11:13:06
Also in:
bpf, lkml, netfilter-devel
Daniel Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
+static int bpf_nf_enable_defrag(struct bpf_nf_link *link)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ switch (link->hook_ops.pf) {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4)
+ case NFPROTO_IPV4:
+ const struct nf_defrag_v4_hook *v4_hook;
+
+ err = request_module("nf_defrag_ipv4");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ v4_hook = rcu_dereference(nf_defrag_v4_hook);
+ err = v4_hook->enable(link->net);
+ rcu_read_unlock();I'd reverse this, first try rcu_dereference(), then modprobe if thats returned NULL.
+static void bpf_nf_disable_defrag(struct bpf_nf_link *link)
+{
+ switch (link->hook_ops.pf) {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4)
+ case NFPROTO_IPV4:
+ const struct nf_defrag_v4_hook *v4_hook;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ v4_hook = rcu_dereference(nf_defrag_v4_hook);
+ v4_hook->disable(link->net);
+ rcu_read_unlock();if (v4_hook) v4_hook->disable() Else we get trouble on manual 'rmmod'.
+ /* make sure conntrack confirm is always last */ + prio = attr->link_create.netfilter.priority; + if (prio == NF_IP_PRI_FIRST) + return -ERANGE; /* sabotage_in and other warts */ + else if (prio == NF_IP_PRI_LAST) + return -ERANGE; /* e.g. conntrack confirm */ + else if ((attr->link_create.netfilter.flags & BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG) && + (prio > NF_IP_PRI_FIRST && prio <= NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG)) + return -ERANGE; /* cannot use defrag if prog runs before nf_defrag */
You could elide the (prio > NF_IP_PRI_FIRST, its already handled by first conditional. Otherwise this looks good to me.