Re: [PATCH net-next v5 03/16] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-06-25 12:20:45
Also in:
ceph-devel, linux-mm, lkml
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 12:55 AM David Howells [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use sendmsg() and MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than sendpage in ceph when transmitting data. For the moment, this can only transmit one page at a time because of the architecture of net/ceph/, but if write_partial_message_data() can be given a bvec[] at a time by the iteration code, this would allow pages to be sent in a batch. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> cc: Xiubo Li <redacted> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org --- Notes: ver #5) - Switch condition for setting MSG_MORE in write_partial_message_data() net/ceph/messenger_v1.c | 60 ++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c index d664cb1593a7..814579f27f04 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c@@ -74,37 +74,6 @@ static int ceph_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct kvec *iov, return r; } -/* - * @more: either or both of MSG_MORE and MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST - */ -static int ceph_tcp_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, - int offset, size_t size, int more) -{ - ssize_t (*sendpage)(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, - int offset, size_t size, int flags); - int flags = MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL | more; - int ret; - - /* - * sendpage cannot properly handle pages with page_count == 0, - * we need to fall back to sendmsg if that's the case. - * - * Same goes for slab pages: skb_can_coalesce() allows - * coalescing neighboring slab objects into a single frag which - * triggers one of hardened usercopy checks. - */ - if (sendpage_ok(page)) - sendpage = sock->ops->sendpage; - else - sendpage = sock_no_sendpage; - - ret = sendpage(sock, page, offset, size, flags); - if (ret == -EAGAIN) - ret = 0; - - return ret; -} - static void con_out_kvec_reset(struct ceph_connection *con) { BUG_ON(con->v1.out_skip);@@ -464,7 +433,6 @@ static int write_partial_message_data(struct ceph_connection *con) struct ceph_msg *msg = con->out_msg; struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor = &msg->cursor; bool do_datacrc = !ceph_test_opt(from_msgr(con->msgr), NOCRC); - int more = MSG_MORE | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST; u32 crc; dout("%s %p msg %p\n", __func__, con, msg);@@ -482,6 +450,10 @@ static int write_partial_message_data(struct ceph_connection *con) */ crc = do_datacrc ? le32_to_cpu(msg->footer.data_crc) : 0; while (cursor->total_resid) { + struct bio_vec bvec; + struct msghdr msghdr = { + .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES,
Hi David, This appears to be losing MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL flags which were set previously?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ }; struct page *page; size_t page_offset; size_t length;@@ -493,10 +465,13 @@ static int write_partial_message_data(struct ceph_connection *con) } page = ceph_msg_data_next(cursor, &page_offset, &length); - if (length == cursor->total_resid) - more = MSG_MORE; - ret = ceph_tcp_sendpage(con->sock, page, page_offset, length, - more); + if (length != cursor->total_resid) + msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE; + + bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, length, page_offset); + iov_iter_bvec(&msghdr.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, length); + + ret = sock_sendmsg(con->sock, &msghdr); if (ret <= 0) {
And this is losing munging -EAGAIN -> 0?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
if (do_datacrc) msg->footer.data_crc = cpu_to_le32(crc);@@ -526,7 +501,10 @@ static int write_partial_message_data(struct ceph_connection *con) */ static int write_partial_skip(struct ceph_connection *con) { - int more = MSG_MORE | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST; + struct bio_vec bvec; + struct msghdr msghdr = { + .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_MORE, + }; int ret; dout("%s %p %d left\n", __func__, con, con->v1.out_skip);@@ -534,9 +512,11 @@ static int write_partial_skip(struct ceph_connection *con) size_t size = min(con->v1.out_skip, (int)PAGE_SIZE); if (size == con->v1.out_skip) - more = MSG_MORE; - ret = ceph_tcp_sendpage(con->sock, ceph_zero_page, 0, size, - more); + msghdr.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE; + bvec_set_page(&bvec, ZERO_PAGE(0), size, 0); + iov_iter_bvec(&msghdr.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size); + + ret = sock_sendmsg(con->sock, &msghdr); if (ret <= 0)
Same here... I would suggest that you keep ceph_tcp_sendpage() function
and make only minimal modifications to avoid regressions.
Thanks,
Ilya