Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather... | netdev

[PATCH net-next v2 00/17] splice, net: Switch over users of sendpage() and remove it · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 02/17] net: Display info about MSG_SPLICE_PAGES memory handling in proc · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 01/17] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
RE: [PATCH net-next v2 01/17] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2023-06-18
[PATCH net-next v2 03/17] tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 11/17] smc: Drop smc_sendpage() in favour of smc_sendmsg() + MSG_SPLICE_PAGES · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 09/17] dlm: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 12/17] ocfs2: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
RE: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2023-06-18
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-18
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> · 2023-06-19
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-19
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> · 2023-06-20
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2023-06-19
[PATCH net-next v2 08/17] rds: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 13/17] drbd: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 04/17] siw: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage to transmit · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 05/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 06/17] net: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) not sendpage in skb_send_sock() · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 07/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 15/17] iscsi: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 16/17] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
[PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17
RE: [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2023-06-18
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-19
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST · Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> · 2023-06-20
[PATCH net-next v2 14/17] drdb: Send an entire bio in a single sendmsg · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-06-17

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2023-06-19 09:31:06
Also in: linux-mm, linux-nvme, lkml

Sagi Grimberg [off-list ref] wrote:

The patch looks good to me, taking it to run some tests
(from sendpage-3-frag branch in your kernel.org tree correct?)

Yep, but you'll patches 1 also and patch 2 might help with seeing what's going
on.

David

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help