[PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 1/9] drivers: fwnode: fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname]() · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 2/9] iio: mb1232: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 3/9] iio: cdc: ad7150: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 4/9] pinctrl: wpcm450: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 6/9] pinctrl: pistachio: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 7/9] i2c: i2c-smbus: fwnode_irq_get_byname() return value fix · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 5/9] pinctrl: ingenic: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 8/9] net-next: mvpp2: relax return value check for IRQ get · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
[PATCH v7 9/9] net-next: mvpp2: don't shadow error · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-05-29
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-05-31
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue · Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2023-06-15
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-06-16
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue · Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> · 2023-06-16

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-05-31 06:34:52
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-mips, lkml

On Mon, 29 May 2023 09:22:15 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote:

The fwnode_irq_get() and the fwnode_irq_get_byname() may have returned
zero if mapping the IRQ fails. This contradicts the
fwnode_irq_get_byname() documentation. Furthermore, returning zero or
errno on error is unepected and can easily lead to problems
like.

What's the merging plan? Could patch 1 go to a stable branch 
and then driver trees can pull it in and apply their respective 
patches locally?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help