Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Date: 2023-05-21 07:34:06
Also in:
bridge
On 19/05/2023 16:51, Ido Schimmel wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:quoted
On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote:quoted
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb) return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED; memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb)); + skb->l2_miss = 0; p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev); if (p->flags & BR_VLAN_TUNNEL)Overall looks good, only this part is a bit worrisome and needs some additional investigation because now we'll unconditionally dirty a cache line for every packet that is forwarded. Could you please check the effect with perf?To eliminate it I tried the approach we discussed yesterday: First, add the miss indication to the bridge's control block which is zeroed for every skb entering the bridge:diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h index 2119729ded2b..bd5c18286a40 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h@@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb { #endif u8 proxyarp_replied:1; u8 src_port_isolated:1; + u8 miss:1; /* FDB or MDB lookup miss */ #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING u8 vlan_filtered:1; #endifAnd set this bit upon misses instead of skb->l2_miss:@@ -203,6 +205,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_bridge_port *prev = NULL; struct net_bridge_port *p; + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; + list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) { /* Do not flood unicast traffic to ports that turn it off, nor * other traffic if flood off, except for traffic we originate@@ -295,6 +299,7 @@ void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst, allow_mode_include = false; } else { p = NULL; + BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1; } while (p || rp) {Then copy it to skb->l2_miss at the very end where the cache line containing this field is already written to:diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c index 84d6dd5e5b1a..89f65564e338 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb br_switchdev_frame_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb); + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; + dev_queue_xmit(skb); return 0;Also for locally received packets:diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb) */ br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb); + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss; + /* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the * packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone * may be running packet capture.Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work. WDYT?
Looks good to me, this is what I had in mind wrt cache line dirtying. The swdev mark already does it, so putting them together is nice. From bridge POV this is good. Thanks, Nik