Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2023-03-27

Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 0/5] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2023-03-27 07:51:43
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-can, linux-devicetree, lkml

On 26.03.2023 18:07:14, Dario Binacchi wrote:
quoted
On 21.03.2023 12:25:15, Dario Binacchi wrote:
quoted
A gentle ping to remind you of this series.
I have no idea why it hasn't deserved any response for quite some
time.
Is there anything I am still missing?
I wonder if we want to do a s/master/primary/ in the DT bindings and
driver?
The ST reference manual (RM0386) explicitly uses the master and slave words
in the bxcan chapter.
ACK
I would stay consistent with it.
Yes, this is a known problem, on the one hand I'd like the drivers to
match the datasheet, but here I am in favor of a deviation.
But I have no problem changing it to primary. I just sent v8 with the
changes you suggested for shared irq and clock enable/disable,
These changes look good!
but if you prefer to use primary I will send the v9 version with that
change. Please let me know your opinion.
Please convert the driver and bindings to use "primary". Feel free to
mention that the datasheet calls the primary peripheral "master".

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129  |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help