On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 06:40:01PM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:

 arch/x86/coco/core.c                |  42 +++++--
 arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c           |  18 +--
 arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c               | 148 +++++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h         |   1 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h  |   3 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h     |  16 ++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h     |   4 +
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c      |  16 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c      |  22 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c          |   2 +
 arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c               |   5 +
 arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c       |  10 +-
 arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c        |   3 -

...

 29 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 439 deletions(-)

The x86 bits look pretty much ready modulo some uncertainties in patch 6.

When this has all been clarified I'm thinking of taking patches

1-2,4-6

through tip and giving an immutable branch to HyperV maintainers to base
the rest ontop...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette