Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 5 authors, 2023-03-22

RE: [PATCH v1] ptp: add ToD device driver for Intel FPGA cards

From: Zhang, Tianfei <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-16 15:05:04
Also in: linux-fpga

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Tianfei
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 10:59 AM
To: Marco Pagani <redacted>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; Weight,
Russell H [off-list ref]; matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com; pierre-
louis.bossart@linux.intel.com; Gomes, Vinicius [off-list ref];
Khadatare, RaghavendraX Anand [off-list ref];
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org; richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] ptp: add ToD device driver for Intel FPGA cards


quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Marco Pagani <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 1:50 AM
To: Zhang, Tianfei <redacted>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com; andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com;
Weight, Russell H [off-list ref];
matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com; pierre-
louis.bossart@linux.intel.com; Gomes, Vinicius
[off-list ref]; Khadatare, RaghavendraX Anand
[off-list ref];
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org;
richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ptp: add ToD device driver for Intel FPGA
cards



On 2023-03-13 04:02, Tianfei Zhang wrote:
quoted
Adding a DFL (Device Feature List) device driver of ToD device for
Intel FPGA cards.

The Intel FPGA Time of Day(ToD) IP within the FPGA DFL bus is
exposed as PTP Hardware clock(PHC) device to the Linux PTP stack to
synchronize the system clock to its ToD information using phc2sys
utility of the Linux PTP stack. The DFL is a hardware List within
FPGA, which defines a linked list of feature headers within the
device MMIO space to provide an extensible way of adding subdevice features.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Khadatare
[off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <redacted>
---
 MAINTAINERS               |   7 +
 drivers/ptp/Kconfig       |  13 ++
 drivers/ptp/Makefile      |   1 +
 drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c | 334
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 355 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index
ec57c42ed544..584979abbd92 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15623,6 +15623,13 @@ L:	netdev@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c

+INTEL PTP DFL ToD DRIVER
+M:	Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>
+L:	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
+L:	netdev@vger.kernel.org
+S:	Maintained
+F:	drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c
+
 OPENCORES I2C BUS DRIVER
 M:	Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
 M:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig index
fe4971b65c64..e0d6f136ee46 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
@@ -186,4 +186,17 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_OCP

 	  More information is available at http://www.timingcard.com/

+config PTP_DFL_TOD
+	tristate "FPGA DFL ToD Driver"
+	depends on FPGA_DFL
+	help
+	  The DFL (Device Feature List) device driver for the Intel ToD
+	  (Time-of-Day) device in FPGA card. The ToD IP within the FPGA
+	  is exposed as PTP Hardware Clock (PHC) device to the Linux PTP
+	  stack to synchronize the system clock to its ToD information
+	  using phc2sys utility of the Linux PTP stack.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called ptp_dfl_tod.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Makefile b/drivers/ptp/Makefile index
28a6fe342d3e..553f18bf3c83 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_IDTCM)	+=
ptp_clockmatrix.o
quoted
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_IDT82P33)	+= ptp_idt82p33.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_VMW)	+= ptp_vmw.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_OCP)	+= ptp_ocp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_DFL_TOD)		+= ptp_dfl_tod.o
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c
new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d9fbdfc53bd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_dfl_tod.c
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * DFL device driver for Time-of-Day (ToD) private feature
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation  */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/dfl.h>
+#include <linux/gcd.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
+
+#define FME_FEATURE_ID_TOD		0x22
+
+/* ToD clock register space. */
+#define TOD_CLK_FREQ			0x038
+
+/*
+ * The read sequence of ToD timestamp registers: TOD_NANOSEC,
+TOD_SECONDSL and
+ * TOD_SECONDSH, because there is a hardware snapshot whenever the
+TOD_NANOSEC
+ * register is read.
+ *
+ * The ToD IP requires writing registers in the reverse order to the read
sequence.
quoted
quoted
+ * The timestamp is corrected when the TOD_NANOSEC register is
+written, so the
+ * sequence of write TOD registers: TOD_SECONDSH, TOD_SECONDSL and
TOD_NANOSEC.
quoted
+ */
+#define TOD_SECONDSH			0x100
+#define TOD_SECONDSL			0x104
+#define TOD_NANOSEC			0x108
+#define TOD_PERIOD			0x110
+#define TOD_ADJUST_PERIOD		0x114
+#define TOD_ADJUST_COUNT		0x118
+#define TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST		0x11c
+#define TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE		0x120
+#define PERIOD_FRAC_OFFSET		16
+#define SECONDS_MSB			GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
+#define SECONDS_LSB			GENMASK_ULL(31, 0)
+#define TOD_SECONDSH_SEC_MSB		GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
+
+#define CAL_SECONDS(m, l)		((FIELD_GET(TOD_SECONDSH_SEC_MSB,
(m)) << 32) | (l))
quoted
+
+#define TOD_PERIOD_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(19, 0)
+#define TOD_PERIOD_MAX			FIELD_MAX(TOD_PERIOD_MASK)
+#define TOD_PERIOD_MIN			0
+#define TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
+#define TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_FNS_MAX
	FIELD_MAX(TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_MASK)
quoted
+#define TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE_MAX	TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_FNS_MAX
+#define TOD_ADJUST_COUNT_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(19, 0)
+#define TOD_ADJUST_COUNT_MAX
	FIELD_MAX(TOD_ADJUST_COUNT_MASK)
quoted
+#define TOD_ADJUST_INTERVAL_US		1000
+#define TOD_ADJUST_MS			\
+		(((TOD_PERIOD_MAX >> 16) + 1) * (TOD_ADJUST_COUNT_MAX + 1))
+#define TOD_ADJUST_MS_MAX		(TOD_ADJUST_MS / MICRO)
+#define TOD_ADJUST_MAX_US		(TOD_ADJUST_MS_MAX *
USEC_PER_MSEC)
quoted
+#define TOD_MAX_ADJ			(500 * MEGA)
+
+struct dfl_tod {
+	struct ptp_clock_info ptp_clock_ops;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock;
+
+	/* ToD Clock address space */
+	void __iomem *tod_ctrl;
+
+	/* ToD clock registers protection */
+	spinlock_t tod_lock;
+};
+
+/*
+ * A fine ToD HW clock offset adjustment. To perform the fine
+offset adjustment, the
+ * adjust_period and adjust_count argument are used to update the
+TOD_ADJUST_PERIOD
+ * and TOD_ADJUST_COUNT register for in hardware. The dt->tod_lock
+spinlock must be
+ * held when calling this function.
+ */
Calling this function while holding the dt->tod_lock spinlock might
cause an error since read_poll_timeout() can sleep. If it is required
to use a spinlock, there is the
readl_poll_timeout_atomic() function, which can be called from atomic context.
However, in this case, it is probably better to use a mutex instead of
a spinlock since the delay appears to be 1 ms.
To program the TOD registers needs to be done without interruption to ensure the
correct values are programmed, So I think using readl_poll_timeout_atomic()
function here is better. This delay should be very faster, the 10 us interval delay will
be better.
quoted
quoted
+static int fine_adjust_tod_clock(struct dfl_tod *dt, u32 adjust_period,
+				 u32 adjust_count)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = dt->tod_ctrl;
+	u32 val;
+
+	writel(adjust_period, base + TOD_ADJUST_PERIOD);
+	writel(adjust_count, base + TOD_ADJUST_COUNT);
+
+	/* Wait for present offset adjustment update to complete */
+	return readl_poll_timeout(base + TOD_ADJUST_COUNT, val, !val,
TOD_ADJUST_INTERVAL_US,
quoted
+				  TOD_ADJUST_MAX_US);
+}
+
+/*
+ * A coarse ToD HW clock offset adjustment.
+ * The coarse time adjustment performs by adding or subtracting the
+delta value
+ * from the current ToD HW clock time.
+ */
+static int coarse_adjust_tod_clock(struct dfl_tod *dt, s64 delta) {
+	u32 seconds_msb, seconds_lsb, nanosec;
+	void __iomem *base = dt->tod_ctrl;
+	u64 seconds, now;
+
+	if (delta == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	nanosec = readl(base + TOD_NANOSEC);
+	seconds_lsb = readl(base + TOD_SECONDSL);
+	seconds_msb = readl(base + TOD_SECONDSH);
+
+	/* Calculate new time */
+	seconds = CAL_SECONDS(seconds_msb, seconds_lsb);
+	now = seconds * NSEC_PER_SEC + nanosec + delta;
+
+	seconds = div_u64_rem(now, NSEC_PER_SEC, &nanosec);
+	seconds_msb = FIELD_GET(SECONDS_MSB, seconds);
+	seconds_lsb = FIELD_GET(SECONDS_LSB, seconds);
+
+	writel(seconds_msb, base + TOD_SECONDSH);
+	writel(seconds_lsb, base + TOD_SECONDSL);
+	writel(nanosec, base + TOD_NANOSEC);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dfl_tod_adjust_fine(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, long
+scaled_ppm) {
+	struct dfl_tod *dt = container_of(ptp, struct dfl_tod, ptp_clock_ops);
+	u32 tod_period, tod_rem, tod_drift_adjust_fns, tod_drift_adjust_rate;
+	void __iomem *base = dt->tod_ctrl;
+	unsigned long flags, rate;
+	u64 ppb;
+
+	/* Get the clock rate from clock frequency register offset */
+	rate = readl(base + TOD_CLK_FREQ);
+
+	/* add GIGA as nominal ppb */
+	ppb = scaled_ppm_to_ppb(scaled_ppm) + GIGA;
+
+	tod_period = div_u64_rem(ppb << PERIOD_FRAC_OFFSET, rate, &tod_rem);
+	if (tod_period > TOD_PERIOD_MAX)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	/*
+	 * The drift of ToD adjusted periodically by adding a drift_adjust_fns
+	 * correction value every drift_adjust_rate count of clock cycles.
+	 */
+	tod_drift_adjust_fns = tod_rem / gcd(tod_rem, rate);
+	tod_drift_adjust_rate = rate / gcd(tod_rem, rate);
+
+	while ((tod_drift_adjust_fns > TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_FNS_MAX) ||
+	       (tod_drift_adjust_rate > TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE_MAX)) {
+		tod_drift_adjust_fns >>= 1;
+		tod_drift_adjust_rate >>= 1;
+	}
Why both tod_drift_adjust_fns and tod_drift_adjust_rate are
iteratively divided if one of the two exceeds the maximum value?
Wouldn't it be more accurate to set each of them to the max if they exceeded their
respective maximum value?

Thanks your point out, calculate the tod_drift_adjust_fns and tod_drift_adjust_rate
separately is better.
Sorry, my last comment is not correct,  I like to add more detail information about this code.

This piece of code adjusts for the non-representable part of the fractional nanosecond part of the target ToD period that corresponds to the nominal or servo-steered frequency.  For example, the clock period for a 10G application (156.25MHz) is 6.4ns. The hexadecimal representation of the integer part (6ns) is 0x6, and the fractional nanosecond part is 0.4 fns (fractional nanosecond), whose 16-bit hexadecimal representation is:

Fractional nanosecond field is 16 bits wide: 0.4 fns = 0.4 * 2^16 = 26214.4 in decimal.
Converting to hexadecimal: 26214 + 0.4 = 0x6666 + 0x0000.4 = 0x6666.4 fns.  

The 16bits register can represent 0x6666, but not 0.4fns. This would cause a systematic drift in the clock equal to 953.6 ns every 1 second.  To compensate for that, the hardware ToD module uses two registers, namely TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST and TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE. The non-representable 0.4 fns per clock cycle equals to 2fns per 5 clock cycles, both of which are integer and representable. 

Hence is the TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST  and TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE registers as follow:

TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST = 0x02
TOD_DRIFT_ADJUST_RATE = 0x5.

The while loop divides the higher-precision result of the divisions by 2 in sequential steps, until both tod_drift_adjust_fns and tod_drift_adjust_rate are representable within their hardware register precision and dynamic range. The while loop has a deterministic upper bound. 

Here is the ToD specification:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/programmable/683044/21-4/adjusting-tod-drift.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help