Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:46:04AM CET, alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com wrote:
On 2/8/23 15:24, Lucero Palau, Alejandro wrote:
quoted
On 2/8/23 14:38, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:25:13PM CET, alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com wrote:
quoted
From: Alejandro Lucero <redacted>
[..]
quoted
+static int efx_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
+ struct devlink_info_req *req,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct efx_devlink *devlink_private = devlink_priv(devlink);
+ struct efx_nic *efx = devlink_private->efx;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Several different MCDI commands are used. We report first error
+ * through extack along with total number of errors. Specific error
+ * information via system messages.
I think you forgot to remove this comment.
With this nit fixed, free free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
I'll do.
Thanks
Just wondering if this single nit deserves a v7 or better to delay it as
another patch.
We got another patchset for ef100 ready to be sent and we would prefer
to not delay this one more than needed.
Cleaner would be v7, but I don't mind that much. Let the patchbot to
decide :)