Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: introduce XDP compliance test tool
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-03 05:05:58
Also in:
bpf, intel-wired-lan
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-03 05:05:58
Also in:
bpf, intel-wired-lan
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:25 AM Lorenzo Bianconi [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce xdp_features tool in order to test XDP features supported by the NIC and match them against advertised ones. In order to test supported/advertised XDP features, xdp_features must run on the Device Under Test (DUT) and on a Tester device. xdp_features opens a control TCP channel between DUT and Tester devices to send control commands from Tester to the DUT and a UDP data channel where the Tester sends UDP 'echo' packets and the DUT is expected to reply back with the same packet. DUT installs multiple XDP programs on the NIC to test XDP capabilities and reports back to the Tester some XDP stats.
'DUT installs...'? what? The device installs XDP programs ?
+
+ ctrl_sockfd = accept(*sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&ctrl_addr, &addrlen);
+ if (ctrl_sockfd < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Failed to accept connection on DUT socket\n");Applied, but overuse of the word 'DUT' is incorrect and confusing. 'DUT socket' ? what is that? 'Invalid DUT address' ? what address? The UX in general is not user friendly. ./xdp_features Invalid ifindex This is not a helpful message. ./xdp_features eth0 Starting DUT on device 3 Failed to accept connection on DUT socket 'Starting DUT' ? What did it start?