Re: [PATCH] net: dccp: delete redundant ackvec record in dccp_insert_options()
From: Hangyu Hua <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-22 02:13:01
Also in:
lkml
On 21/2/2023 20:46, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:22 AM Hangyu Hua [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
A useless record can be insert into av_records when dccp_insert_options() fails after dccp_insert_option_ackvec(). Repeated triggering may cause av_records to have a lot of useless record with the same avr_ack_seqno. Fixes: 8b7b6c75c638 ("dccp: Integrate feature-negotiation insertion code") Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <redacted> --- net/dccp/options.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/dccp/options.c b/net/dccp/options.c index d24cad05001e..8aa4abeb15ea 100644 --- a/net/dccp/options.c +++ b/net/dccp/options.c@@ -549,6 +549,8 @@ static void dccp_insert_option_padding(struct sk_buff *skb) int dccp_insert_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct dccp_sock *dp = dccp_sk(sk); + struct dccp_ackvec *av = dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec; + struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr; DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_opt_len = 0;@@ -577,16 +579,22 @@ int dccp_insert_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (dp->dccps_hc_rx_insert_options) { if (ccid_hc_rx_insert_options(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb)) - return -1; + goto delete_ackvec; dp->dccps_hc_rx_insert_options = 0; } if (dp->dccps_timestamp_echo != 0 && dccp_insert_option_timestamp_echo(dp, NULL, skb)) - return -1; + goto delete_ackvec; dccp_insert_option_padding(skb); return 0; + +delete_ackvec: + avr = dccp_ackvec_lookup(&av->av_records, DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq);Why avr would be not NULL ?quoted
+ list_del(&avr->avr_node); + kmem_cache_free(dccp_ackvec_record_slab, avr); + return -1; }Are you really using DCCP and/or how have you tested this patch ? net/dccp/ackvec.c:15:static struct kmem_cache *dccp_ackvec_record_slab; I doubt this patch has been compiled. I would rather mark DCCP deprecated and stop trying to fix it.
My bad. I will fix these problems. Thanks, Hangyu