From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11:55 AM

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:48:06PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:

quoted

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11:33 AM

quoted

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:01:25PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:

quoted

Unless there are objections, I'll go with CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR_DEVICES,

What does "DEVICES" mean in this context?

You need to think about !virt people too who are already confused by the
word "paravisor". :-)

Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment about "Either 1".   We can
avoid "PARAVISOR" entirely by going with two attributes:

No, I'm fine with CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR. Why would you have to have
CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR_DEVICES? I.e., the string "_DEVICES" appended after
"PARAVISOR". Isn't CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR enough?

Works for me. :-)

Michael