Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap
From: Bobby Eshleman <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-06 16:26:17
Also in:
bpf, kvm, linux-kselftest, lkml
From: Bobby Eshleman <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-06 16:26:17
Also in:
bpf, kvm, linux-kselftest, lkml
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 12:08:49PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:35:11PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:quoted
Add support for sockmap to vsock. We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the performance of such a setup. Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by 121% in basic testing. Tested as follows. Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock redirector -> host vsock server Threads: 1 Payload: 64k No sockmap: - 76.3 MB/s - The guest vsock redirector was "socat VSOCK-CONNECT:2:1234 UNIX-RECV:/path/to/sock" Using sockmap (this patch): - 168.8 MB/s (+121%) - The guest redirector was a simple sockmap echo server, redirecting unix ingress to vsock 2:1234 egress. - Same sender and server programs *Note: these numbers are from RFC v1 Only the virtio transport has been tested. The loopback transport was used in writing bpf/selftests, but not thoroughly tested otherwise. This series requires the skb patch.Looks good to me. Definitely good to go as non-RFC. Thanks.
Thank you for the review. Best, Bobby