Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid indirect memory pressure calls
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2023-02-28 17:42:20
Subsystem:
networking [general], networking [sockets], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Willem de Bruijn, Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 5:44 PM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:49 PM Florian Westphal [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
There is a noticeable tcp performance regression (loopback or cross-netns), seen with iperf3 -Z (sendfile mode) when generic retpolines are needed. With SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD checks gone number of calls to enter/leave memory pressure happen much more often. For TCP indirect calls are used. We can't remove the if-set-return short-circuit check in tcp_enter_memory_pressure because there are callers other than sk_enter_memory_pressure. Doing a check in the sk wrapper too reduces the indirect calls enough to recover some performance. Before, 0.00-60.00 sec 322 GBytes 46.1 Gbits/sec receiver After: 0.00-60.04 sec 359 GBytes 51.4 Gbits/sec receiver
BTW I was curious why Google was not seeing this, and it appears Brian Vasquez
forgot to upstream this change...
commit 5ea2f21d6c1078d2c563cb455ad5877b4ada94e1
Author: Brian Vazquez [off-list ref]
Date: Thu Mar 3 19:09:49 2022 -0800
PRODKERNEL: net-directcall: annotate tcp_leave_memory_pressure and
tcp_getsockopt
Switch to upstream infra to make rebase easier
Tested: built and booted on lab machine
Upstream-Plan: 150254871
Effort: net-directcall
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 05032b399c873984e5297898d647905ca9f21f2e..54cb989dc162f3982380ac12cf5a150214e209a2100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c@@ -2647,10 +2647,13 @@ static void sk_enter_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk) sk->sk_prot->enter_memory_pressure(sk); } +INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(void tcp_leave_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk)); + static void sk_leave_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk) { if (sk->sk_prot->leave_memory_pressure) { - sk->sk_prot->leave_memory_pressure(sk); + INDIRECT_CALL_1(sk->sk_prot->leave_memory_pressure, + tcp_leave_memory_pressure, sk); } else { unsigned long *memory_pressure = sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure;
@@ -3439,6 +3442,10 @@ int sock_recv_errqueue(struct sock *sk, structmsghdr *msg, int len, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_recv_errqueue); +INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int tcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, + int optname, char __user *optval, + int __user *optlen)); + /* * Get a socket option on an socket. *
@@ -3451,7 +3458,8 @@ int sock_common_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,int level, int optname,
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- return sk->sk_prot->getsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+ return INDIRECT_CALL_1(sk->sk_prot->getsockopt, tcp_getsockopt,
+ sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_getsockopt);