Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: fix possible unsigned integer overflow
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2023-01-31 07:51:46
Also in:
bpf
Subsystem:
networking drivers, the rest, virtio net driver · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds, "Michael S. Tsirkin", Jason Wang
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:20:49AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:43:37AM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:quoted
When the single-buffer xdp is loaded and after xdp_linearize_page() is called, *num_buf becomes 0 and (*num_buf - 1) may overflow into a large integer in virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(), resulting in unexpected packet dropping. Fixes: ef75cb51f139 ("virtio-net: build xdp_buff with multi buffers") Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <redacted> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>Given the confusion, just make num_buf an int?In the structure virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf, \field{num_buffers} is unsigned int, which matches each other.
Because hardware buffers are all unsigned. Does not mean we need to do all math unsigned now.
And num_buf is used in many different places, it seems to be a lot of work to modify it to int.
Are you sure? Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 18b3de854aeb..97f2e9bfc6f9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi) * have enough headroom. */ static struct page *xdp_linearize_page(struct receive_queue *rq, - u16 *num_buf, + int *num_buf, struct page *p, int offset, int page_off,
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev, if (unlikely(xdp_headroom < virtnet_get_headroom(vi))) { int offset = buf - page_address(page) + header_offset; unsigned int tlen = len + vi->hdr_len; - u16 num_buf = 1; + int num_buf = 1; xdp_headroom = virtnet_get_headroom(vi); header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev, struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats) { struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf; - u16 num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers); + int num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers); struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf); int offset = buf - page_address(page); struct sk_buff *head_skb, *curr_skb;
Feel free to reuse.
quoted
quoted
--- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index aaa6fe9b214a..a8e9462903fa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev, xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, buf - VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM, VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM + vi->hdr_len, len - vi->hdr_len, true); + if (!*num_buf) + return 0; + if (*num_buf > 1) { /* If we want to build multi-buffer xdp, we need * to specify that the flags of xdp_buff have theThis means truesize won't be set.Do you mean xdp_frags_truesize please? If yes, the answer is yes, this fix is only for single-buffer xdp, which doesn't need xdp_frags_truesize, and already set it to 0 in its wrapper receive_mergeable().
It seems cleaner to always set the value not rely on caller to do so.
quoted
quoted
@@ -1020,10 +1023,10 @@ static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev, shinfo->xdp_frags_size = 0; } - if ((*num_buf - 1) > MAX_SKB_FRAGS) + if (*num_buf > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) return -EINVAL;Admittedly this is cleaner.quoted
- while ((--*num_buf) >= 1) { + while (--*num_buf) {A bit more fragile, > 0 would be better.Sure. Thanks.quoted
quoted
buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, &len, &ctx); if (unlikely(!buf)) { pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n", -- 2.19.1.6.gb485710b