Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2023-01-31

Re: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary debug messages.

From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-31 09:20:26
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:11:10AM +0000, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:25:56AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
quoted
From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>

NPC exact match feature is supported only on one silicon variant, 
removed debug messages which print that this feature is not available 
on all other silicon variants.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <redacted>
---
 .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c | 12 
++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
index f69102d20c90..ad1374a12a40 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
@@ -200,10 +200,8 @@ void npc_config_secret_key(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
 	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
 	u8 intf;
 
-	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
-		dev_info(rvu->dev, "HW does not support secret key configuration\n");
+	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
 		rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_SECRET_KEY0(intf), @@ 
-221,10 +219,8 @@ void npc_program_mkex_hash(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
 	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
 	u8 intf;
 
-	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
-		dev_dbg(rvu->dev, "Field hash extract feature is not supported\n");
+	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
 		npc_program_mkex_hash_rx(rvu, blkaddr, intf); @@ -1854,16 +1850,12 
@@ int rvu_npc_exact_init(struct rvu *rvu)
 	/* Check exact match feature is supported */
 	npc_const3 = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_CONST3);
 	if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
-		dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
-			 __func__);
 		return 0;
 	}
quoted
You should remove () brackets here too.
Ratheesh ->  Sorry , I did not get you. We have more than one statement in this "if" loop. How can we remove brackets ?
Please configure your email client to respect reply format.

Probably my typo mislead you, you need to remove {} brackets.

Before your change

     if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
            dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
                     __func__);
            return 0;
     }

After your change:

    if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
            return 0;
    }

Thanks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help