On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:27:26PM +0000, Жандарович Никита Игоревич
wrote:
quoted
quoted
What is the git commit id of this upstream?
And I can't apply this as-is for the obvious reason it would mess up
the changelog, how did you create this?
confused,
greg k-h
Commit in question is b671da33d1c5973f90f098ff66a91953691df582
upstream. I wasn't certain it makes sense to backport the whole patch
as only a small portion of it pertains to the fault at question.
What is the "fault"?
In 5.10.y "mt7615_init_tx_queues() returns 0 regardless of how final
mt7615_init_tx_queue() performs. If mt7615_init_tx_queue() fails (due to
memory issues, for instance), parent function will still erroneously
return 0."
This was fixed upstream, although that particular commit's scope was broader.
And why not take the whole thing? What's wrong with that? We almost
always want to take whatever is in Linus's tree because when we do not, we
almost always cause bugs or other problems (later merge issues.)
So always take the original fix please.
thanks,
greg k-h
That makes sense, of course. Thanks for your patience, will work toward backporting the whole thing.
regards,
Nikita