Re: [PATCH] netrom: Fix use-after-free caused by accept on already connected socket
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-23 19:28:10
Also in:
linux-hams
From: Hyunwoo Kim <redacted> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:22:09 -0800
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:24:57AM -0800, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:quoted
From: Hyunwoo Kim <redacted> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:57:06 -0800quoted
Hi, Thank you for your review. On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:22:00AM -0800, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:quoted
Hi, Thanks for the patch! From: Hyunwoo Kim <redacted> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 07:08:59 -0800quoted
If listen() and accept() are called on an AF_NETROM socket that has already been connect()ed, accept() succeeds in connecting. This is because nr_accept() dequeues the skb queued in `sk->sk_receive_queue` in nr_connect(). This causes nr_accept() to allocate and return a sock with the sk of the parent AF_NETROM socket. And here's where use-after-free can happen through complex race conditions:cpu0 cpu1 1. socket_2 = socket(AF_NETROM) listen(socket_2) accepted_socket = accept(socket_2) // loopback connection with socket_1 2. socket_1 = socket(AF_NETROM) nr_create() // sk refcount : 1 connect(socket_1) // loopback connection with socket_2 nr_connect() nr_establish_data_link() nr_write_internal() nr_transmit_buffer() nr_route_frame() nr_loopback_queue() nr_loopback_timer() nr_rx_frame() nr_process_rx_frame() nr_state3_machine() nr_queue_rx_frame() sock_queue_rcv_skb() sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason() __sock_queue_rcv_skb() __skb_queue_tail(list, skb); // list : sk->sk_receive_queue 3. listen(socket_1) nr_listen() uaf_socket = accept(socket_1) nr_accept() skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue);Sorry, I didn't understand how this is populated by close(accepted_socket), especially how skb->sk is set as socket_1's sk.When calling close(accepted_socket), accepted_socket is currently in NR_STATE_3 state, so nr_release() calls `nr_write_internal(sk, NR_DISCREQ)`. In a later flow, nr_rx_frame() is called, where nr_find_socket() is used to get socket_1's sk from the global list `nr_list` (Because `circuit_index` and `circuit_id` used for search were index/id of socket_1's sk):sk = NULL; if (circuit_index == 0 && circuit_id == 0) { if (frametype == NR_CONNACK && flags == NR_CHOKE_FLAG) sk = nr_find_peer(peer_circuit_index, peer_circuit_id, src); } else { if (frametype == NR_CONNREQ) sk = nr_find_peer(circuit_index, circuit_id, src); else sk = nr_find_socket(circuit_index, circuit_id); // here }And nr_process_rx_frame(), nr_state3_machine(), nr_disconnect() are executed sequentially, and `nr_sk(sk)->state = NR_STATE_0;` is executed, so the state of socket_1 sk becomes NR_STATE_0.Right, but nr_process_rx_frame() just sends out NR_DISCACK for accepted_socket, and nr_disconnect() does not queue skb for socket_1 ? IIUC, uaf_socket's sk is the same one with socket_1, but I'm wondering how the sk is queued up for socket_1's recv queue at 4.As I understand it, you know that socket_1 and uaf_socket's sk are the same, but you're confused about how the accepted_socket's sk of number 4 is equal to socket_1's sk, am I correct?
No. I'm not sure how close(accepeted_socket) populates socket_1's sk_receive_queue by a skb->sk with socket_1's sk so that uaf_socket has the same sk with socket_1.
The sk of socket_1 and the sk of accepted_socket are completely different. In the flow chart I made, socket_1 and uaf_socket have the same sk, socket_2 has distinct sk, and accepted_socket has distinct non-overlapping sk. (There are a total of three sks in the flowchart.) The reason accepted_socket can refer to the sk of socket_1 in #4 is that `->your_index` and `->your_id` of the sk of accepted_socket point to the sk of socket_1. As explained before, this index/id is used to get the sk of socket_1. (In flowchart #4, nr_process_rx_frame() is called using the sk of socket_1 retrieved from nr_list, rather than using accepted_socket's own sk)
I understand this, but to make "uaf_socket = accept(socket_1)" happen, we need to put a skb in socket_1's recv_q in 4. with the found sk. As you said, 4. finds the sk by nr_find_socket() (as not listener) and ends up calling nr_process_rx_frame(), which does not queue the skb with the sk for socket_1's queue, right ? In short, where is a skb created with socket_1's sk and queued for socket_1's recv_q ? We don't call sock_queue_rcv_skb() at 4.
Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding and giving a strange answer.quoted
quoted
As a result, `5. In close(socket_1)`, the code of `case NR_STATE_0:` of nr_release() is executed to free the sk, and finally, by calling `close(uaf_socket)`, UAF occurs by referring to the freed sk.quoted
quoted
4. close(accepted_socket) nr_release() nr_write_internal(sk, NR_DISCREQ) nr_transmit_buffer() // NR_DISCREQ nr_route_frame() nr_loopback_queue() nr_loopback_timer() nr_rx_frame() // sk : socket_1's sk nr_process_rx_frame() // NR_STATE_3 nr_state3_machine() // NR_DISCREQ nr_disconnect() nr_sk(sk)->state = NR_STATE_0; 5. close(socket_1) // sk refcount : 3 nr_release() // NR_STATE_0 sock_put(sk); // sk refcount : 0 sk_free(sk); close(uaf_socket) nr_release() sock_hold(sk); // UAFKASAN report by syzbot:BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nr_release+0x66/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:520 Write of size 4 at addr ffff8880235d8080 by task syz-executor564/5128 CPU: 0 PID: 5128 Comm: syz-executor564 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:306 [inline] print_report+0x15e/0x461 mm/kasan/report.c:417 kasan_report+0xbf/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:517 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x141/0x190 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:102 [inline] atomic_fetch_add_relaxed include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:116 [inline] __refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:193 [inline] __refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:250 [inline] refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:267 [inline] sock_hold include/net/sock.h:775 [inline] nr_release+0x66/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:520 __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365 __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320 task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867 do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012 get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f6c19e3c9b9 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c19e3c98f. RSP: 002b:00007fffd4ba2ce8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: 0000000000000116 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f6c19e3c9b9 RDX: 0000000000000318 RSI: 00000000200bd000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 000000000000000d R09: 000000000000000d R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055555566a2c0 R13: 0000000000000011 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Allocated by task 5128: kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:45 kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:52 ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:371 [inline] ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:330 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa3/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:380 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:968 [inline] __kmalloc+0x5a/0xd0 mm/slab_common.c:981 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:584 [inline] sk_prot_alloc+0x140/0x290 net/core/sock.c:2038 sk_alloc+0x3a/0x7a0 net/core/sock.c:2091 nr_create+0xb6/0x5f0 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:433 __sock_create+0x359/0x790 net/socket.c:1515 sock_create net/socket.c:1566 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1603 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1588 [inline] __sys_socket+0x133/0x250 net/socket.c:1636 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1649 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1647 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1647 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Freed by task 5128: kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:45 kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:52 kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:518 ____kasan_slab_free mm/kasan/common.c:236 [inline] ____kasan_slab_free+0x13b/0x1a0 mm/kasan/common.c:200 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] __cache_free mm/slab.c:3394 [inline] __do_kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3580 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x3b0 mm/slab.c:3587 sk_prot_free net/core/sock.c:2074 [inline] __sk_destruct+0x5df/0x750 net/core/sock.c:2166 sk_destruct net/core/sock.c:2181 [inline] __sk_free+0x175/0x460 net/core/sock.c:2192 sk_free+0x7c/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2203 sock_put include/net/sock.h:1991 [inline] nr_release+0x39e/0x460 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:554 __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365 __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320 task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867 do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012 get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcdTo fix this problem, nr_listen() returns -EINVAL for sockets that successfully nr_connect().I'd add Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")quoted
Reported-by: syzbot+caa188bdfc1eeafeb418@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <redacted> --- net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c index 6f7f4392cffb..dcfa606684d7 100644 --- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c +++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c@@ -400,6 +400,11 @@ static int nr_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog) struct sock *sk = sock->sk; lock_sock(sk); + if (sock->state == SS_CONNECTED) {I guess the same issue happens for SS_CONNECTING (non-blocking connect()), so this should be if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED) { ? Same for the rose and x25 patches. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230122173957.GA99728@ubuntu/ (local) https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230122170925.GA98061@ubuntu/ (local)you're right. I will submit the fixed v2 patches. Regards, Hyunwoo Kimquoted
Thanks, Kuniyukiquoted
+ release_sock(sk); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) { memset(&nr_sk(sk)->user_addr, 0, AX25_ADDR_LEN); sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = backlog; -- 2.25.1